I won’t marry my partner of 16 years until humanist weddings are legally recognised
As a humanist, I use reason and compassion as a guide in the one life I believe we live, without reference to any supernatural deity or realm. A religious wedding isn’t an option, nor is a civil ceremony
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Today, Thursday 27 January, MPs will debate whether to legally recognise humanist marriages in England and Wales: a simple and uncontroversial piece of legislation that, despite cross-party support, the government has stalled on for nearly a decade. Until humanist marriages have proper recognition, I won’t marry my partner of 16 years.
At the moment, if a couple wishes to have a humanist wedding and be married in the eyes of the law, they need to have a civil marriage with a registrar as well. It’s a costly and laborious process, which often involves having to explain to confused family members why there are two ceremonies, one of which they may not even be invited to. And it means that the one the law sees as their “real” wedding is not the one that is of significance to them.
As a Humanists UK celebrant, I see couples make this decision all the time – despite its setbacks and the extra cost and organisation involved. This is because humanist ceremonies are so deeply personal and unique to the couple, reflective of their beliefs and how they view the world around them.
This is a view shared by my partner, Christopher, and I. We’ve been together for 16 years and though we want to get married as soon as possible, this won’t be at any cost. As humanists, we want a distinctly humanist form of marriage, which allows us to not only express our feelings and beliefs fully and authentically, but will also demonstrate and add weight to our personal commitment and efforts to live that way.
As a humanist, I use reason and compassion as a guide in the one life I believe we live, without reference to any supernatural deity or realm. A religious wedding isn’t an option, nor is a civil ceremony, which for me represents in essence only the establishment of a legal contract of marriage. It does not reflect the deeper, more profound meaning and significance of marriage, nor does it allow me to express my feelings and beliefs fully and authentically.
To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment, sign up to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter by clicking here
My partner and I love each other. We are fully committed to one another and intend to spend the rest of our lives together. With increasing age, we feel it is ever more important to have the opportunity to legally reflect our lasting commitment to one another, as well as providing us equal status, something that will be of significance when, inevitably, one of us dies.
Feeling as strongly as we do, Christopher and I were one of six humanist couples who took a legal case against the government in the High Court in 2020. The government has had the ability to enact legal recognition of humanist marriages by order since 2013. With parliamentary approval already granted, this change could be implemented almost overnight. Yet, in the nine years that have passed, the government has stalled implementing review after review, disheartening thousands of couples in England and Wales who wished to marry this way.
Though the judge in that case acknowledged that “the present law gives rise to … discrimination”, she refused to issue a declaration of incompatibility. This is because she agreed with the government’s argument that it wished to implement “wholesale” rather than “piecemeal” reform of marriage law, by way of an ongoing Law Commission review.
The review started in 2018, is expected to report this summer, and won’t be implemented until 2024, if at all. The main reason why the government’s wish for wholesale reform only was deemed to be legitimate was because of inconsistencies in existing marriage law that need resolving on who could and could not get married outdoors.
Since then, however, the government has moved to allow civil and religious marriages outdoors, with the move already in place for civil marriages. Humanist marriages have once again been left off the table. It was the exact type of piecemeal reform that the government claimed it wished to avoid. It doesn’t make sense. Clearly, when it has the will, the government can make change happen. That is why I’m so glad humanist marriages are being debated in the House of Commons on Thursday, and that there’s not only cross-party support, but support from MPs across the spectrum of religions and beliefs. I also gather that a letter is being released, signed by 53 MPs and peers, calling for the same.
Like all milestones in life, I want ceremonies that reflect my humanist beliefs and values. When I die, I will have a humanist funeral. When I marry, I will have a humanist wedding. I fail to understand or see any reason why my partner and I should not be given that right.
Kate Harrison is a humanist and Humanists UK celebrant
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments