Health 'shackles' good for patients: Letter

Dr A. M. Gordhandas
Thursday 17 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The new White Paper which promises to remove the shackles of inflexibility from general practitioners and primary health care ("Back to the future with cottage hospitals", 16 October) would do more harm than good.

It is the present "inflexibility" of the system which maintains the excellent doctor-patient relationship which is the bedrock of primary care. In the present system, general practitioners, besides having a contractual duty towards their patients, also have a moral duty.

Remove these shackles and you will also remove the "morality" which exists within the profession. Let us not forget that legal constraints protect an individual when things go wrong, but moral constraints prevent a mishap occurring in the first place.

Recreating cottage hospitals is not as bright an idea as it seems on paper. Why were district hospitals created? Because the quality of work outside teaching institutions was so patchy and uneven that patients were suffering.

In its headlong rush to "improve" the NHS, a euphemism to reduce costs, the Government is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Dr A M GORDHANDAS

Scunthorpe, Humberside

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in