We will soon find out what 'unity' really means for the Palestinians

Following the deal between Fatah and Hamas, the real question is: does Israel want peace with its neighbour?

Robert Fisk
Middle East Correspondent
Thursday 12 October 2017 12:00 EDT
Comments
Palestinians wave National and Egyptian flags as they celebrate the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza City
Palestinians wave National and Egyptian flags as they celebrate the reconciliation agreement between Hamas and Fatah in Gaza City (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

“Unity” is the most misused and misunderstood word in Arabic. “Ittihad”. Every dictatorship, every nation in the Middle East must believe in “ittihad”. And the Palestinans – the poor, divided Palestinians more than all others.

For years they have been torn apart between Hamas and Fatah, between Islamism (if you believe in such a thing) and the Palestinian Authority, between Islamic rule – again, if you believe in this – and secular authority. And when Mahmoud Abbas was called by the United States to be told of America’s “concern” that Hamas would be involved in such a government, you knew there would be a problem.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced, of course, that ‘Abu Mazen’ (Mahmoud Abbas) had said “Yes to terrorism and no to peace.” This was ridiculous. If Abbas has managed to bring Hamas to heel – through financial threats – then the old PLO of Yassir Arafat has been re-created once more.

Netanyahu will have to talk to the Fatah-led PLO and will have to return to the ‘peace treaty’ in which the West (and Tony Blair, remember him?) believed. Far from “terror”, Gaza will belong to the Palestinian Authority, in which Israeli leaders claimed they believed. Well, we shall see.

The real question is: do the Israelis want peace with the Palestinians? Or do they want the land of the West Bank? If the latter is the case, then the Netanyahu government will refuse to accept a new PLO-Hamas accord.

They will say – and the Trump regime will follow suite – that Hamas is a terrorist organisation, and that Israel has no-one to negotiate with. At which point, they must decide whether they want to run an apartheid state in the West Bank (no votes for Arabs) or an Israel which is not democratic.

Read any of the recent articles by Uri Avnery, if you want to find out. He is a great Israeli philosopher, a wonderful writer, a true messiah, a leader of his people – if they will listen to him.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in