From Ardal to OJ: the names in the frame

Miles Kington
Wednesday 01 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Every year, people who have been analysing the births columns write to The Independent to tell us that Sophie has edged ahead of Tamsin again or that James and John are still popular. Regular readers of this column will know that I have a more sophisticated approach: I take names only from the newspaper headlines, thus making sure that I find all the most influential names of the year.

In 1995, for instance, I found that the most common first name for boys according to the headline test was one not even mentioned in the births columns. It was, of course, "OJ".

Another popular name in 1995 was Nick, being borne by such celebrities as Nick Faldo, Nick Leeson, Nick Ross, Anne'n'Nick etc. Most of these have vanished from public fame (for a long time, in Mr Leeson's case) with the curious result that this year the name Nicholas has overtaken Nick. Not, in all cases, with happy results. The name Nicholas seems to be favoured by politicians who have a habit of slipping on banana skins. Sir Nicholas Lyell, for instance, who was adjudged by the Scott Report to have got things so badly wrong that a less sensitive man might have thought of resigning. Nicholas Soames, for another example, who told the House that he had got it all wrong about Gulf War Syndrome and was sorry for having misled the House, and Sir Nicholas Scott, who was adjudged by his constituency party to have been lying. Lying on a pavement because of painkillers, apparently, but still lying. Our advice is to take anything told you by a politician called Nicholas with a pinch of salt. And Michael, too, if we think of Howard and Portillo.

And William, too, if we think of William Waldegrave who was adjudged by the Scott Report to have told untruths to Parliament but who told us he could not see why he should resign. Maybe this was not true either.

Other names which did better than usual in 1996 - among the male contenders - were Kevin and Ian, who were for Britain what OJ was for the US, and Damon, owing to the success of Damon Hill, who won the BBC Sports Personality of the Year title, despite having kept any signs of a personality invisible from the public. The same is true of John Major, who was awarded a personality by listeners of Today, but not by anyone else. Perhaps it was a joke by multiple telephoners from the Tory party.

There were some new names among the male candidates. Nice to see Slobodan and Radovan on the up, as well as Gareth, the only big new name to emerge from Euro 96. Arwel was a new one on me, being borne by one of the emerging Welsh rugby stars, and so was Ardal, which seems to be a name favoured by Irish comedians along with Dermot and Dylan. I am convinced that Neil would have been up there if only Neil Hamilton had had the courage to take on The Guardian in court, or at least slipped them some money to stop them asking questions, but it was not to be ...

So, without further ado, to the top 10 male names of 1996. Drum roll and fanfare, please! (Last year's positions are in brackets, incidentally.)

l. Mister ............................. (-)

2. Binyamin ...................... (-)

3. Wallace ......................... (-)

4. Gromit .......................... (-)

5. Colin ............................. (-)

6. Moham(m)ed ............... (-)

7. Nicholas ....................... (9)

8. Saddam ......................... (-)

9. Bhumibol ..................... (7)

10. Paul ............................. (-)

Mister, of course, is the universal first name of all Jane Austen heroes - Mr Darcy, Mr Willoughby, etc - and as this has been Austen year again, it was an inevitable winner. Binyamin is the exotic first name of Israel's leader, though of course it is not as exotic as his second name, pronounced Net-and-yahoo. Wallace and Gromit need no explanation, though I may say en passant how nice it is to see a dog's name up there. Colin is the name of the man who should have been American president. Every time Clinton or Dole was mentioned (and, incidentally, isn't it odd that a man named after unemployment pay should run for the presidency?), someone else wrote regretfully about Colin Powell being so much better. Moham(m)ed is the name shared by the man who owns Harrods and Punch and also by Mohammed al-Masari, the now forgotten Saudi troublemaker, and indeed by the great Prophet. Bhumibol is the name of the king of Thailand who has not only been on the throne for 40 years but also likes jazz, which is beyond any of our royal family. And Paul creeps in finally because there are so many people called Paul - Gambaccini, Merton, Gascoigne, Boateng, etc - and nobody called Gazza any more.

Girls' names tomorrow!

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in