Britain’s foreign aid cuts have hit women and girls hardest – they should be reversed
When the government chooses to stop funding programmes designed to prevent the exploitation of women and girls, it loses the right to call itself a ‘development superpower’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nelson Mandela once said: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”
Never has this been truer than when it comes to girls. Support a girl through quality education and she will live a longer, healthier, and more prosperous life, allowing her to fully contribute to her family, community and country. That’s why the prime minister’s commitment in 2019 to support millions of girls through 12 years of education was enthusiastically received by parliamentarians of all political persuasions.
Since that promise, which now seems a lifetime ago, the rhetoric risks turning into empty promises and overused soundbites. Why? Because just over a year ago, the government decided to drastically cut the UK aid budget, hurting the most marginalised people around the world and letting down the girls this government promised to support. It took away their chance of a brighter future. The cuts have been relentless, even by the government’s own assessment.
On International Women’s Day, the international development committee was forced to use parliamentary privilege to publish an assessment of the UK aid cuts that the government had refused to release. This assessment, undertaken by then-foreign secretary Dominic Raab, admits that foreign aid cuts have had a significant, detrimental impact on women and girls.
When the government chooses to stop funding programmes designed to prevent the exploitation of women and girls, to put girls in school, or to support disabled people who are most at risk of being left in poverty; it loses the right to call itself a “development superpower”.
To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment sign up to our free weekly Voices newsletter by clicking here
Thankfully, the current foreign secretary, Liz Truss, has confirmed she will reinstate funding to support women and girls. And she has the perfect opportunity to put this commitment into practice when the government publishes the new International Development Strategy this spring. Women and girls should be at its centre.
Restoring the budget for women and girls back to pre-pandemic levels will be a welcome start. It will also go some way to restoring our reputation as a nation that champions women and girls around the world.
But this must be an urgent step towards a promise from this government to fully restore the UK aid budget to 0.7 per cent of GNI (gross national income), supporting the people who need it the most.
Sarah Champion MP is chair of the International Development Committee
Baroness Sugg is minister for international development and special envoy for girls’ education at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments