'Time out' may be what the Middle East needs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ehud Barak's request for "time out" from the peace process is - on the face of it - a cynical move to enable Israel's forces to redeploy for a full assault on the Palestinians, while maintaining that he intends to return to the negotiating table as soon as order is restored. If his intention is to unleash helicopter gunships to wash the streets of Jerusalem and Ramallah with Palestinian blood, he deserves the world's repudiation. We can now expect the Palestinians to demand the same flexibility while they rain stones and terror on Israeli troops and settlers. Yet, as we pointed out last week, the Sharm el-Sheikh summit which finished on Tuesday was ill-conceived and ill-timed. It was aimed as much at Bill Clinton's place in history as at Middle Eastern peace, and was doomed to failure. If Mr Barak's wheeze can sustain a dying peace process, it will be worth trying. As Northern Ireland has proved, the path to peace can be littered with twisted semantics and bizarre terminology. A "time out" is a novel idea.
Ehud Barak's request for "time out" from the peace process is - on the face of it - a cynical move to enable Israel's forces to redeploy for a full assault on the Palestinians, while maintaining that he intends to return to the negotiating table as soon as order is restored. If his intention is to unleash helicopter gunships to wash the streets of Jerusalem and Ramallah with Palestinian blood, he deserves the world's repudiation. We can now expect the Palestinians to demand the same flexibility while they rain stones and terror on Israeli troops and settlers. Yet, as we pointed out last week, the Sharm el-Sheikh summit which finished on Tuesday was ill-conceived and ill-timed. It was aimed as much at Bill Clinton's place in history as at Middle Eastern peace, and was doomed to failure. If Mr Barak's wheeze can sustain a dying peace process, it will be worth trying. As Northern Ireland has proved, the path to peace can be littered with twisted semantics and bizarre terminology. A "time out" is a novel idea. But it could be a useful one.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments