Time for an ombudsman

Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The new schools minister, David Miliband, has given headteachers cause to hope that their protests about exam overload might be listened to. Addressing the subject of secondary-school reform at the National Association of Head Teachers conference in Torquay, he said the responses to the Government's Green Paper on 14-to 19-year-olds showed the time might be ripe for a national debate on the reforms. It might be a good idea to set time aside for it, he added.

No government minister has yet acknowledged that today's pupils are over-assessed, but a national debate would give head teachers the chance to hammer home the message that something in our overcrowded system has to give. They would no doubt be strongly supported by parents' representatives.

The Government is anxious for any debate to encompass its plans for a matriculation certificate for 19-year-olds and to bridge the academic/vocational divide. The heads would want it also to cover their grievances about the present exams system. Whatever Mr Miliband's comment was expected to achieve, it has at least conveyed the impression that the Government is prepared to listen to the voices of the profession before pressing ahead with reforms. A national debate is welcome.

Meanwhile, tales of dissatisfaction with the workings of the exam system and the performance of exam boards continue to emerge. On page 4 Nicholas Pyke tells the sorry story of Queen's College London's four-month battle with Edexcel over its AS-level English marks. As a result of its traumas, the school's head of English is suggesting that there should be a new examinations ombudsman to deal with complaints. John Dunford, the general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, suggests the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, the Government's exams watchdog, should set up a special quality assurance unit to play this particular role.

Edexcel has established its own customer service centre since the débâcle of last summer brought about by the massive expansion of the exam system. However, an outside body to rule on the complaints of schools and students would seem to be a better way of restoring confidence in the examination system.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in