This futile debate about bringing back hanging
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The public is clearly worried about crime and punishment, but we seem as a nation to be less willing than we were to exact the ultimate penalty.
It is a sign of the times, and an encouraging one, that so much of the renewed debate about the restoration of the death penalty seems fatuous. That is not just because of the incoherence of so many of the proponents of hanging, although that has certainly been a feature of their arguments. Nor is it just that those hysterical voices calling for legalised murder seem more and more isolated, although the fact that they are such a visibly shrinking band is also striking.
The important change is the sense that, even against the background of such an appalling crime as the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, there is no public mood for hanging to be brought back. The polling has indicated only lukewarm support, and that at a time when emotions about child murder are running exceptionally high. The debate about the return of hanging sounds about as relevant as one about the return of the wig tax.
The reality, of course, is that a Parliament with a Labour majority of 167 is not going to reintroduce hanging. If anything, that understates parliamentary resistance to capital punishment. Even 15 years ago, when we had a Conservative government led by a committed hanger, Margaret Thatcher, commanding a similar landslide majority, and with the Brighton bombing still a recent memory, the reactionaries were kept at bay.
The likes of Ann Widdecombe have never been as powerful as their high profile suggests. Today, miscarriages of justice such as the cases of the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four have persuaded some thoughtful Tories who were once in favour of the death penalty, notably the former Home Secretary Michael Howard, to change their minds. That, of course, is why those who want to reintroduce this barbaric practice demand a referendum. But it is not a major constitutional issue, and Parliament is the right place to decide such matters.
The public is clearly worried about crime and punishment. But we seem as a nation to be less willing than we were to exact the ultimate penalty. Thus, while this summer has been scarred by an act of unfathomable brutality, in one respect at least we do seem to have become a more civilised society.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments