The responsibility for Abu Ghraib goes to the top

Tuesday 24 August 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Few people - other than blind supporters of the way President Bush has conducted the war in Iraq - will be surprised to learn that top Pentagon and US Army officials have been implicated in the maltreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. Yesterday an official commission for the first time linked the abuse with the guidance and policies set by top officials in Washington. Its language was not dramatic - after all, its chairman, James R Schlesinger, a former Defense Secretary, was handpicked for the inquiry by Donald Rumsfeld, the man many regard as the prime villain - but its message was unmistakable.

Few people - other than blind supporters of the way President Bush has conducted the war in Iraq - will be surprised to learn that top Pentagon and US Army officials have been implicated in the maltreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. Yesterday an official commission for the first time linked the abuse with the guidance and policies set by top officials in Washington. Its language was not dramatic - after all, its chairman, James R Schlesinger, a former Defense Secretary, was handpicked for the inquiry by Donald Rumsfeld, the man many regard as the prime villain - but its message was unmistakable.

The Schlesinger report places the blame for the scandal on General Ricardo S Sanchez, then the top US commander in Iraq, who once called on intelligence officers to work more closely with military police to "manipulate an internee's emotions and weaknesses". Another report, by Major General George R Fay, due out tomorrow, will recommend that at least 20 intelligence officers face punishment for their behaviour, which included sanctioning the use of unmuzzled dogs to intimidate prisoners. All this further undermines the claim by the Bush administration that the abuse was the work of the few "bad apples" currently being court-martialled at a US base in Mannheim.

It was not a claim which ever had much credibility. The same reports of systematic brutality, gunpoint interrogation, sleep deprivation and sexual humiliation which came from Abu Ghraib were also voiced by those released from Guantanamo Bay and Bagram airbase in Afghanistan. Some of the measures were even enshrined in the official advice of Pentagon lawyers, who drew up a 72-point matrix of approved "stress and duress" techniques for use in interrogation. They were part of what the Red Cross denounced as "a general pattern of mistreatment of detainees" right across the prisons of Iraq.

Now an official US commission has given its verdict too. Whatever the show trials in Mannheim find, few will doubt that George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld are guilty of setting the moral climate which allowed such behaviour to take place.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in