The parent trap

Only political action will reverse rise in stay-at-home youth

Editorial
Tuesday 29 July 2014 04:28 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When think-tanks and sociologists turn a mind to the question of young people’s political apathy, in particular their reluctance to turn up on election day, it is often said that many simply do not see how the brouhaha in Westminster affects their daily lives. As excuses go, this one loses ground by the day.

According to research from the homelessness charity Shelter, two million of the 20- to 34-year-olds living with their parents at the time of the 2011 census, or 75 per cent of the total, had a job. This fits into a pattern of young people failing to fly the nest: since 1996, the number of stay-at-homers has jumped by a quarter. In effect, a salary no longer pays enough to propel young people out from under their parents’ wing. PMQs might seem a world away. But anybody facing an early adulthood spent sharing toothpaste with mum and dad has ample reason to make their mark in 2015.

The dearth of affordable housing cannot, of course, be solely attributed to political failures. But private house-building has held up fairly well since the early 1980s, at a rate of around 160,000 new builds per year. In contrast, successive Labour and Tory governments have ducked out of spending money on homes for the less well-off, favouring schools and the NHS. The proliferation of luxury properties at the top end of the market, and a waiting list of 4.5 million for social housing at the bottom, testifies to decades of laissez-faire. As a result, young people without parental assistance may see that first rung on the property ladder as somewhere around neck height. Renting alone is a step too far for many.

Housing is a political problem, and a solution will require more political intervention. Help to Buy – the Government’s flagship programme – stimulates demand and not supply. Another coalition scheme, the £7bn New Homes Bonus, has done little to boost construction. Any manifesto writers in Labour, Tory or Liberal Democrat HQ who propose a fix should be able to swing some support from young people. If they’re too apathetic to notice, perhaps the parents forced into prolonged laundry duty might have a little word.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in