The bright side of the spill

Saturday 23 November 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The tragic oil spill from the tanker Prestige now affecting Spain's Galician coast could not obscure an encouraging, if unpublicised, achievement.

The tragic oil spill from the tanker Prestige now affecting Spain's Galician coast could not obscure an encouraging, if unpublicised, achievement. The number of such accidents has dropped extraordinarily over the past decade. In the 1970s there was an average of 24 major spills a year, shedding over 320,000 tonnes of oil into the seas; in 1979, the worst year, 34 accidents spilled 608,000 tonnes. Last year there were just three spills, releasing only 8,000 tonnes.

The Prestige will add a blip to this striking decline. However, it should not detract from what has been done by international regulations standards and treaties. More, of course, still needs to be done. Ships should be made to sail further from dangerous coastlines such as these. Single-hulled tankers should be phased out before 2015. And tougher inspections should remove old sub-standard – but cheap to hire – tankers from the seas.

Pictures of black tides and oiled birds naturally stir public imagination, but environmental pressure groups must be careful not to overstate their case in trying to capitalise upon it. By describing such spills as "environmental catastrophes" they risk making their economic and social effects, which have much the greatest impact on the area, even worse by causing tourists to shun the areas and causing shoppers to avoid their fish for years to come. There are real environmental catastrophes facing the world, such as global warming, the desertification that threatens to turn one third of the world's crop land into dust, and the rapid extinction of countless species. By failing to discriminate, they threaten to undermine the credibility upon which they ultimately depend.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in