Smoking, interrupted

More evidence that e-cigarettes can boost public health

Editorial
Tuesday 20 May 2014 15:31 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Over the half century since the link with cancer was established, smoking is well down among almost all classes and age groups – young women being the worrying exception – but more needs to be done to help us kick the habit. Given the vast human suffering and sheer cost to the NHS of tobacco use, every assistance in reducing the toll should be embraced. If e-cigarettes can help smokers quit more effectively than nicotine patches and gum, as the latest surveys suggest, then the authorities should encourage their use; in extreme cases e-cigarettes might even be prescribed by a GP.

There seems little downside. It is unlikely that adolescents will start smoking through the acceptance of e-cigarettes – just as patches and gum did not prove to be much of a “gateway” to smoking cigarettes: e-cigarettes, it is safe to say, do not possess even the superficial air of sophistication that conventional cigarettes do. Nor do these bizarre little devices “normalise” smoking in the way critics fear. Even if they did, they would still be better than conventional smoking – and that is really the choice for too many unfortunate addicts.

Pragmatism is the ally of public health. In an imperfect world, but one where the effects of smoking comprise a large threat to the health of the nation, we should act on the balance of probabilities – which is that e-cigarettes cut smoking. Like health education, the ban in pubs and high taxation, e-cigarettes are part of the answer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in