Mothers should never have been made to feel like failures for shunning a 'natural birth'
The Royal College of Midwives has said women will no longer be told that they should have babies without medical intervention
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The motives that lay behind the Royal College of Midwives’ 12-year campaign for “natural birth” were sincere. Indeed as a body of professionals dedicated to their vocation, and experts in their field, their advice to mothers was respected and often followed. It stemmed in turn from a desire to hold the line against an over-medicalised society generally, where medications and procedures are sometimes deployed unnecessarily and counterproductively, even.
The over-lavish prescription of antibiotics is one example of overcautious medics having a perverse effect on health and resistance.
Childbirth, however, is different and the College’s previous advice strayed into a place where pregnant women began to feel as though they were failures if they wished or needed to have an epidural, be induced or undergo a caesarean section. A lot of silly and sloppy media comment about being “too posh to push” helped confuse matters. The bias against intervention was itself unhealthy.
Somewhere, the simple principle that the welfare of mother and baby comes first was thrown out with the bathwater, so to speak. Every woman has a right to choose what she needs for a safe delivery, and the right to avoid pain and distress or damage to her and her baby. That is only as “unnatural” as taking medication for high blood pressure, or having chemotherapy or anaesthetic for an operation.
Virtually no branch of medicine since the age of the ancient apothecaries can be said to be wholly “natural” and to stigmatise people who prefer modern medicine to avoid pain or danger to their baby was an error of judgement by the midwives – though it is fair to say theirs was a policy of encouragement rather than compulsion.
It may be no coincidence that the NHS, challenged as it is financially to make the best of its budgets, has quietly dropped homeopathy and herbal medicines. We are, mercifully, moving away from a fetishisation of the “natural” and valuing the astonishing achievements science has bestowed on humanity. The midwives have done the right thing for their charges.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments