Road safety: Youth is not the only issue

Thursday 27 December 2007 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Proposals are to be put out for discussion in the new year that would have the effect of raising the legal driving age from 17 to 18. Although a 17-year-old would be able to obtain a provisional licence, the training and testing process would generally take a full year, so ensuring that only 18-year-olds were legally permitted to drive alone.

The howls of frustration among today's 15 and 16-year-olds can well be imagined, especially those living in areas poorly served by public transport. Just as they are anticipating the freedom of the roads, there they are threatened with more rigorous tests and another wait.

On the face of it, though, there are compelling reasons for a change. The toll of death and injury among young, inexperienced drivers is little short of a national scandal. Young men are especially accident-prone, with 50 per cent of those under 21 involved in a crash in their first year on the road. The accident rate falls significantly among drivers with even a year's experience.

If it were calculated that such a de-facto increase in the permitted driving age would save young lives and make the roads safer for everyone else, we see no reason why it should not be embraced. But it would be important also to explore possible unintended consequences that might make matters worse.

Extending the tuition process and multiplying the formal tests will increase the already steep cost of a driving licence. Unless driving lessons can somehow be incorporated in the school curriculum, the cost of driving legally could become prohibitive for many. In an age when a driving licence is a prerequisite for many jobs, teenagers from poorer households could find themselves at an even greater disadvantage than they already are.

The cost of driving lessons, moreover, is only the first stage of a multiple outlay, of which one of the biggest expenses is insurance. The cost of insurance for inexperienced drivers under 21 those most likely to be involved in accidents may keep some off the roads, so preventing them from gaining the experience that would make them safer; far more just take to the roads illegally.

The linking of the official databases for driving licences, vehicle registration and insurance was intended to facilitate the tracking of drivers who broke the law. One result, however, is that those who might once have been tempted to dispense only with insurance, now drive entirely outside the law and the ubiquitous cameras are no help.

There are many different issues here that need to be tackled. Raising the legal driving age may address some of the safety problems on our roads, but it will be far from providing a panacea.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in