Quantitative easing: The US was right to go down this path of economic stimulus

 

Editorial
Wednesday 29 October 2014 21:39 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The curtain is coming down on the greatest monetary stimulus of all time. As expected, America’s central bank yesterday confirmed it will stop adding to its stock of government debt and mortgage purchases this month. With $4.5 trillion on the balance sheet – equivalent to 25 per cent of America’s GDP – the Federal Reserve has decided that the time has come to halt its quantitative easing programme.

So what have we learnt since the programme was begun in 2008? We’re certainly wiser about how economies work in the wake of massive debt bubbles. Predictions that money-printing on this scale would inevitably result in an explosive surge of inflation have not been borne out. Consumer prices in America remain quiescent. It turns out that when confidence has fallen through the floor and everyone is desperate to pay down debt the normal economic rules do not apply.

We’ve also learnt that there are limits to the invigorating powers of monetary policy. Despite QE, America’s recovery from the 2008 crash has been one of the weakest on record. This does not mean QE failed; the situation would certainly have been much worse in its absence. But it does mean that monetary policy alone is no panacea for sickly economies. Fiscal policy – government tax and spending decisions – matters too.

The big unanswered question is over QE’s financial side-effects. Asset prices around the world have – as expected – been given a tremendous boost by the programme. Will markets collapse without the Fed’s monetary support? There are good reasons to believe they won’t, but the truth is that nobody really knows.

And though America’s QE chapter is over, in other parts of the world the day of stimulus is still dawning. Japan is stepping on the monetary accelerator as Shinzo Abe’s government belatedly tries to pull the country out of its two decade-long deflationary funk. The European Central Bank says a QE programme could be adopted in the eurozone if inflation in the single currency continues to fall. Let others learn from both the triumphs and the disappointments of the great American monetary experiment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in