Productivity deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Apologists for the Royal Family seem to have an endless supply of reasons why the monarchy should always cost the taxpayer more rather than less. After all, polo ponies are rather expensive to look after.
Yesterday's figures for last year's cost to the public of the Royal Family are not huge: £36m. Alan Reid, the Queen's Keeper of the Privy Purse, says that "taking inflation into account, the cost per head of the population is still that of a loaf of bread". A fair point, Mr Reid, and the reference to white sliced a nice try-on with the proles. But that 60p can still be too much, you know. What about value for money? What about productivity? Surely there is some more room for improvement there? Can the little-used royal train really be the only dignified way for the Windsors to gad about? Why polo? Why the Earl of Wessex?
The price of monarchy, we should be aware, is eternal vigilance.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments