Politically correct? Yes, and proud of it

Friday 18 October 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A living language is a battleground, and every now and again a phrase is fought over with the kind of ferocity that turned the fields of Flanders to a sea of mud. The phrase of the moment is political correctness. Popularised by the liberal left as a device of gentle self-mockery, it has now been seized by the right as a blunt weapon of populist resentment.

It has been the chief instrument of the Daily Mail's ugly campaign against the National Lottery Community Fund. The fund stands accused of handing out public money to "politically correct" causes such as the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns at the expense of "politically incorrect" ones such as charities for war veterans. (One result of this campaign has been a spate of hate mail from the Daily Mail's "wonderful readers" to Lady Brittan, the fund's chairwoman.)

The war has been one-sided so far. Because liberals never used the phrase seriously, they have been slow to take its theft seriously. But it is time to make a stand for political correctness. It is, after all, defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as "conforming to a body of liberal or radical opinion, esp. on social matters, characterised by the advocacy of approved causes or views, and often by the rejection of language, behaviour, etc, considered discriminatory or offensive". We do not know about advocating "approved" views, but The Independent is certainly keen to avoid language that large numbers of people find offensive. That is mere politeness. But what of the substance of the Mail's complaints?

We have no problem with – to take the examples given in yesterday's Mail – grants to marginalised groups such as deaf homosexuals in Birmingham, or for play facilities for the children of travellers in Belfast, or for women's groups in Nigeria, Uganda and Ethiopia. And more public money should go to these causes than to the relatively well-funded charities for old soldiers. If being politically correct means fighting prejudice and discrimination, this newspaper is proud to be PC.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in