Plain speaker

Tuesday 17 October 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The election for Speaker of the House of Commons has a reputation for being deeply arcane; and, true to that reputation, only half the candidates to succeed Betty Boothroyd have put out statements of what they would do were they to win next Monday. That is, however, a minor step forward, since in the past candidates have "emerged" unheralded from behind-the-scenes consultations. But, somewhat typically, the front-runners have decided not to participate; a stance aptly condemned by Peter Bradley MP: "If you sent United Nations observers to this election, they would declare that it wasn't free and fair."

The election for Speaker of the House of Commons has a reputation for being deeply arcane; and, true to that reputation, only half the candidates to succeed Betty Boothroyd have put out statements of what they would do were they to win next Monday. That is, however, a minor step forward, since in the past candidates have "emerged" unheralded from behind-the-scenes consultations. But, somewhat typically, the front-runners have decided not to participate; a stance aptly condemned by Peter Bradley MP: "If you sent United Nations observers to this election, they would declare that it wasn't free and fair."

But it is still a matter of interest (and entertainment) to examine the seven statements that have appeared. "Modernising" makes an inevitable early appearance, with David Clark (Lab) wanting to discard the Speaker's traditional wig, silk stockings and buckle shoes. But he is opposed by Sir Patrick Cormack (Con), who stresses the importance of traditions. John Butterfill (Con) is for shortening working hours, which is bound to prove popular with his electorate. But it is the veteran Gwyneth Dunwoody (Lab) who offers the most blatant appeal to Members' hearts: more pay and better facilities. Watch that woman.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in