Penalty area: It would be wrong for England alone to boycott the World Cup

 

Editorial
Monday 17 November 2014 16:23 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The call by David Bernstein, the former chairman of the FA, for a boycott of the World Cup as a means of forcing change at a corrupt and discredited Fifa, the sport’s global governing body, is gallant but almost certainly self-defeating.

A withdrawal by England alone would be seen as sour grapes on the part of a country whose absence would be barely noticed. More promising, on paper, is a Europe-wide boycott. But even that seems unlikely, despite the sympathetic noises emanating from Germany, the reigning world champions.

Far from all 52 members of Uefa, the continent’s administrative body, would be in favour, and the move could be portrayed as football’s richest countries selfishly parting from the have-nots in the developing world.

But if an internal cure is impossible, there are other means of cleansing the Augean stables at Fifa. The first is a withdrawal by the World Cup’s sponsors, which would hit the organisation and its kingpins in the only place they understand – the wallet. Then again the record of corporations in putting principle above profit is not especially encouraging.

A second avenue is the current investigation by the FBI into the corruption allegations swept under the carpet by Fifa’s mendacious summary of the 430-page report – a version instantly disowned by the original’s author Michael Garcia, the American prosecutor commissioned to investigate the awarding of the 2018 World Cup to Russia and the 2022 competition to Qatar. Unlike some parties Fifa deals with, the FBI is not easy to shake off.

Most important of all however, the original Garcia report must be made public. Fifa’s refusal to do so is outrageous. The most popular sport on the planet belongs to the world, not to a self-important, out-of-touch coterie in Zurich, whose recent conduct has been disgraceful. If ever there was a need for a whistle-blower – or a good old-fashioned leaker – it is now.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in