Of hoods - and the causes of hoods

Friday 20 May 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

So that proves it then. The number of shoppers at the Bluewater centre in Kent has risen by 22 per cent since it banned gangs of youths wearing hoods and baseball caps. Eliminate the hoodies, and you eliminate fear. Tony Blair and John Prescott were right to back the Bluewater ban after all. Er, not quite. Maybe that is not what it proves at all. Maybe all it shows is that shoppers share the same prejudices as the Bluewater managers and our Prime Minister and his deputy. And that they are all wrong.

So that proves it then. The number of shoppers at the Bluewater centre in Kent has risen by 22 per cent since it banned gangs of youths wearing hoods and baseball caps. Eliminate the hoodies, and you eliminate fear. Tony Blair and John Prescott were right to back the Bluewater ban after all. Er, not quite. Maybe that is not what it proves at all. Maybe all it shows is that shoppers share the same prejudices as the Bluewater managers and our Prime Minister and his deputy. And that they are all wrong.

Clothing has always been more than mere apparel. What we choose to wear makes a statement, sometimes of individuality, more usually of conformity to whichever of the many tribes, clans or classes we choose to belong. And age has long been a factor here. Teddy boys, mods and rockers, punks, hip-hop gangstas have all used clothing as a badge of teenage rite of passage. The whole point of it is that adults don't like it.

Nor do they like - reasonably enough - young people who hang around street corners spitting, swearing, urinating, dropping litter and generally lurking in a fashion that intimidates other members of the community. The mistake is to associate the clothing with the behaviour, as though there is a causal link. It is a mistake that adults have made with most of the teenage groups mentioned above. Pubs and other establishments have long refused entrance to individuals wearing certain items of clothing. But what has lifted the current wave of hoodie hysteria to the level of a moral panic is the way that sections of the press have rolled all manner of dark events into one ball of fear, suggesting that hordes of feral children are menacing the entire country.

Where antisocial behaviour is a problem, what is required is the improved application of existing measures: getting the police to enforce the laws that already exist, pressing for improvements in schools and widening the availability of activities for youths within the community. For the Government to join in a "zero tolerance" policy on certain types of clothing smacks of empty populism. Tough on hoods, and tough on the causes of hoods. It is the politics of desperation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in