Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No sooner, it seems, has one judicial conflict with the European Court been removed – with the deportation of Abu Qatada to Jordan – than another unwelcome verdict lands from Strasbourg.
By 16 to one, the judges ruled yesterday that whole-life terms of imprisonment constitute inhuman and degrading treatment; such sentences must be subject to review.
From an ethical perspective, it is surely right that no prisoner is seen as beyond rehabilitation. And the court made clear that such a provision does not presuppose imminent release. Its effect would be more procedural than practical. But that does not make the ruling any more palatable to the Government, or to David Cameron, who has insisted that in the most heinous cases “life must mean life”. In truth, his difficulty with the European Court’s ruling is not judicial, but political – which, of course, only makes it that much harder to accept.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments