Monument to indecision

Friday 12 May 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Decision. So, at long last, after 150 years, plentiful suggestions and lengthy deliberations, most recently by a distinguished panel under the leadership of Sir John Mortimer, a decision has been reached about a statue to stand on the fourth, empty plinth in Trafalgar Square: there's not going to be one.

Sir John, explaining yesterday why the plinth would instead be occupied by a rotating series of temporary art works, was his usual eloquent self. The solution reached, he said, would constitute a "celebration of our artistic revival and the vitality and vivacity of this moment as opposed to the great moments of the past". Permanent statues, he implied gently, were rather outmoded in these days of Tate Modern Cool Britannia.

He has a point. We would be extremely pressed to decide between the lasting merits of suggestions that have ranged - if that is not too expansive a term - from a giant pigeon to David Beckham. Nevertheless, we would prefer to see the decision as evidence that another great national characteristic continues to linger under the veneer of the forceful new. It has often been dismissed as weak, vacillatory and just a little perfidious. But we would seek to proclaim it as a strength.

One of the rotating exhibits should be an empty plinth above the plain inscription: "The Compromise".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in