London may well benefit from a winning bid
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The signs commanding us to "Back the Bid" have gone up across London; the nation's celebrities are weighing in to lend their glitz, and yet the capital's inhabitants remain lukewarm about the prospect of hosting the 2012 Olympic Games. Many even hope that the 600-page blueprint handed to the International Olympic Committee in Switzerland yesterday will fail to win over its members when they cast their votes early next year.
The signs commanding us to "Back the Bid" have gone up across London; the nation's celebrities are weighing in to lend their glitz, and yet the capital's inhabitants remain lukewarm about the prospect of hosting the 2012 Olympic Games. Many even hope that the 600-page blueprint handed to the International Olympic Committee in Switzerland yesterday will fail to win over its members when they cast their votes early next year.
Public support in London is lower than in all the other rival cities except New York. Even among Londoners who support the bid, pessimism is high about the city's chances against Paris or Madrid, the bookmakers' favourites. Yet this cannot, as Lord Coe and his organising committee have suggested, be blamed on a defeatist "British psyche". There are well-founded concerns, of which the biggest is that the capital's decrepit transport system will be unable to cope with the increase in numbers.
This newspaper initially opposed the bid on the basis that if Britain were to host the Olympics, then a venue outside London would be preferable. But it is London that is making the running now. Yesterday's submission of detailed plans brings the competing cities to the final stages of this contest; it is a good moment to consider the prize for Britain. Here at last is an opportunity to rectify the chronic under-investment in transport that has been dragging the capital down for years. Olympic cities such as Barcelona and Sydney have demonstrated that the regenerative legacy for a host city can be immense. The benefits for housing, transport and sport in London's East End could be impressive.
But London also deserves a fair hearing on its existing strengths. Hyperbole of the organisers notwithstanding, it is one of the world's great cities, and one that can offer the Olympic movement a truly global Games. The millions of tourists who come here every year already know that the capital, for all its faults, is one of the most exciting places on earth to visit. Olympic visitors can also be assured that the city's much-maligned inhabitants are a more stoical, tolerant and welcoming bunch than their reputation suggests.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments