Leading article: What happened to our profusion of cousins?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Yet more evidence of the profusion of human ancestry has dealt another blow to the notion of a single "missing link" between modern Homo sapiens and our ape-like forebears.
We may have known for some time that, as recently as a few tens of thousands of years ago, we lived alongside Homo neanderthalensis and Homo floresiensis. But three new fossils found in Kenya and dating back nearly two million years now prove that probably for all of human existence there were several different "Homo" species living at the same time.
The question, then, is why only we survived. Did we breed our evolutionary cousins out of existence, or exterminate them, or simply out-compete them? Whatever the answer, it is time to let go of the iconic image of the "march of progress", with 15 proto-humans in a neat line from ancient ape to one of us. Reality – as is so often the case – is rather messier.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments