Leading article: Wanted: a cultural shift

Monday 06 April 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was probably not the best time to promote employment reform. Just a day after the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, admitted that Britain's recession would be both deeper and longer than he first predicted, his colleague Harriet Harman announced that the right to request flexible working hours will be extended to all parents of children aged 16 and younger.

Yet while the timing is unfortunate, flexible working, as a principle, is welcome. Greater flexibility allows both parents to spend more time with their offspring, something studies have found to be important in children's development.

There are also tangible benefits for businesses. In February, a study backed by small business groups found that both staff retention and productivity increased in those firms that allowed their workers some flexibility over their hours.

Furthermore, both the Confederation of British Industry and the Federation of Small Businesses recognise that, though Britain's service sector economy is well suited to flexible working, we lag behind Europe in implementing such practices.

There is concern, however, that these new rules will do more harm than good. Ms Harman, the Minister for Women and Equality, has been fighting a lengthy battle with Cabinet colleagues – Business Secretary Peter Mandelson among them – who argue that it is unreasonable to further burden firms with regulation at a time of recession.

One size does not fit all in the business world, and nor does one policy. Though it might be reasonable to expect larger firms to allow flexibility now, smaller firms are unlikely to thank the Government for the higher costs it imposes.

So, for many employees, the Government's plans might end up offering little. Few workers in the present climate will seek flexible working hours without their bosses' full support.

What we really need is a cultural shift away from "presenteeism" and towards working practices that respect the needs of families. For our society to achieve this, we will need substantially more than a few new regulations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in