Leading article: Unruly admirals

Wednesday 10 November 2010 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For a group of senior retired naval officers, including the former minister Lord West, to demand a rethink of government cuts to the Senior Service is unwise, to say the least. That they should choose the week of Armistice Day to make their démarche, when public sympathy with the armed forces is at its height, smacks of cynical calculation.

Most reprehensible of all, though, is the suggestion that Argentina, by virtue of the decision to scrap the Ark Royal and the fleet of Harrier jump jets, is "practically invited" to reinvade the Falklands. In many countries, such a sentiment would be seen as treacherous, in giving comfort to the enemy. Here, it forced a statement from the Falklands authorities that they had confidence in their security.

The Comprehensive Spending Review and the Strategic Defence and Security Review were preceded by intense lobbying from all branches of the armed forces. There was also extensive formal consultation. In the end, though, it is for the elected government to decide. Lord West and his co-signatories clearly do not like the result, but they are arguably implicated in the over-ambitious spending that cost the Navy the Ark Royal. Once the decision has been taken, the time for complaint is over. If the Navy still has a ship with a plank, they should walk it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in