Leading article: Uneasy peace in the Caucasus

Friday 07 August 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This time last year a short, sharp war in the Caucasus provided an unwelcome distraction from the opening days of the Beijing Olympics. For the best part of a week, Georgian and Russian troops vented long-held resentments with armed force. For a few hours, there was even a Cold War-style threat of a military confrontation between US and Russian forces, as US warships and Russian troops both descended on the Black Sea coast. Mercifully, both sides held back.

In the 12 months that have passed, it could be argued that not much has changed. Yesterday was a day of mourning and commemoration in Georgia; flags were lowered, church services held, and new pleas made on behalf of the thousands who remain refugees in their own country after being driven from their homes in South Ossetia. Russia, which retains suzerainty both of South Ossetia and Georgia's other minority enclave, Abkhazia, defended its intervention. The report of an international commission into how the war came about, including the vexed question of who started it, has been delayed. In Georgia, despite forecasts that he could be overthrown, Mikheil Saakashvili is still in power.

Yet while tensions remain, especially around South Ossetia, there have been changes. The competing ambitions of both Georgia and Russia have been curbed. Almost no country followed Russia in recognising South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Russia has not succeeded in bending Georgia to its will. The war also demonstrated once again the risks to the West of over-reliance on one individual leader.

The new realism can also be seen in the efforts of President Obama to rebalance US relations with Georgia. He has scaled back promises of Nato membership, while promising continued support and also trying to put relations with Russia on a new footing. The aftermath of the war has afforded a glimpse, too, of what more active European Union diplomacy might achieve. The six-point agreement negotiated by President Sarkozy, while not perfectly observed, has held and provides the framework for a longer-term settlement. Progress may be modest, but today's uneasy peace is infinitely preferable to last year's war.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in