Leading article: Too little, too late

Friday 16 February 2007 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There was certainly cause for encouragement from this week's informal Washington climate change conference. Delegates from G8 countries as well as China, India, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa concluded with an agreement that man-made climate change is "beyond doubt". They agreed, too, that developing countries, as well as rich countries, must accept targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. There was also a consensus that a successor to the Kyoto protocol on climate change must be in place by 2009.

This highlights a welcome change in mood among politicians from the world's largest polluters. Kyoto made no emission-reducing demands on developing countries. There is an emerging consensus that the successor treaty must place targets on China and India. With China building a new coal-fired power station almost every week, this is essential.

Yet a crucial problem remains. The United States, under the present administration, rejects the need for mandatory targets. The White House under President Bush still believes technology will come to the rescue. There will never be serious engagement from developing countries on climate change while the world's richest country and biggest polluter behaves as if it were business as usual.

It is true that encouraging signs are emerging that President Bush's successor will adopt a more enlightened approach. The likely Republican presidential candidate, John McCain, who was present at the conference, is signed up to the need for serious initiatives on climate change. Senator Joe Lieberman has forecast that the US Congress will enact a law on cutting emissions by the end of next year. And many US politicians believe that America, outside the White House, is ready for mandatory cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

But even then, the world will have to wait until 2009 for change. That means two years of inaction. Those are two years that we can ill afford. The revelation this week of fast-moving rivers of water beneath the massive ice sheets of Antactica and the latest report this month from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that the climate emergency is more advanced than previously believed. Yet global politics continues to lag irresponsibly behind.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in