Leading article: Time to rethink stop and search

Friday 13 January 2012 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The newly appointed Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, says he wants to cut his officers' use of random stop-and-search powers by half. Rightly so. It can only be hoped that other police forces around the country will follow the Met's lead.

There are three basic problems with stop and search. The most glaring is that, used randomly, it is highly inefficient: barely one in 10 searches results in an arrest, and in some areas the rate drops as low as 2 per cent. Even so, police use of the power has spiralled out of control. There were more than 50,000 searches last year in London alone.

Most pernicious of all is the effect on community relations as disproportionate targeting of ethnic groups inflames racial tensions and entrenches a destructive "them and us" mentality in police and citizens alike.

The statistics are unequivocal. Black people are six times more likely to be stopped and searched than their white counterparts, Asian people twice as likely. No amount of rationalisation can either make such obvious discrimination acceptable, or dispel the bad feeling it causes. Stop and search not only excerbates ethnic friction, but it also provides ammunition to those who would foster such grievances for their own ends.

Neither should the corrosive effect of antagonism between the police and local communities be downplayed. It would, of course, be simplistic to blame last August's riots on a single cause. But the fact that a high proportion of participants blamed recurrent, low-level humiliation at the hands of the police cannot be ignored either. The sad thing is the extent to which history has repeated itself. The precursor to current stop-and-search laws – the hated "sus" laws – were repealed after race riots in the early 1980s similarly shone a spotlight on police targeting of young black men.

It may be that there is an effective role for targeted stop and search, in combating rising levels of knife crime, for example. But the powers must be more closely controlled and more intelligently applied. Mr Hogan-Howe is to be applauded for taking the initiative.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in