Leading article: Time to end the show

Thursday 05 May 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The days have long gone, fortunately, when most Britons considered watching cockfighting or bear baiting a pleasurable way of spending some free time. It is high time that the sight of big animals cavorting for the pleasure of the public in circuses went the same way. It is deeply regrettable that Downing Street has apparently blocked plans to ban these performances, opting instead for an improved system of self-regulation on the part of circuses themselves.

Today, The Independent urges the Prime Minister, David Cameron, to reconsider this position, ban the use of big animals in circuses and stop their import for use in circuses in future. The fact that only a relatively small number of big animals is believed to be still engaged in these acts is neither here nor there. What is important is that we send a signal, making it clear that Britain no longer tolerates the inappropriate treatment of animals under the guise of entertainment.

It is shameful that a country that prides itself on its kindness to animals is falling behind the standard set in this field by several countries in the developing world – countries that make no such claims on their own behalf. Nor can the Coalition Government cite public opinion as an excuse for delay. Most surveys suggest that the overwhelming majority of people oppose the continued use of wild animals in circuses. Meanwhile, every reputable organisation working in the field of wildlife protection, including the RSPCA, believes that transporting animals round the country and training them to perform harms their welfare. Leaving aside important questions about the amount of living space they receive, and specific allegations concerning the ill treatment of certain animals, academic evidence suggests circus life by its very nature causes stress and damages their mental health.

A ban will, no doubt, be attacked in some quarters as the equivalent of a death sentence for circuses as a whole. This is nonsense. Most people who go to them wish to see human beings perform – people who are paid to do so and who can presumably leave and do something else if they wish. Performing animals enjoy no such liberty.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in