Leading article: Time to cut back on over-long school holidays
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The days when all hands – even little ones – were required for the summer harvest are long gone. And yet the tradition of a six-week summer holiday lingers, not least in the minds of local authority bureaucrats, the majority of whom have decided to take no action on Education Secretary Michael Gove's suggestion that the holiday should be cut to four weeks.
They are wrong. All the academic evidence suggests that long holidays are bad for children, and bad for poorer children, particularly those from ethnic minorities.
Put simply, school compensates for disadvantages at home. So while children with difficult backgrounds may keep up with their more privileged peers in term time, their reading age stalls over the summer. Teachers spend the first weeks in September recovering lost ground. Free schools and academies show signs of understanding this. It is time state schools did, too.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments