Leading article: The real issue behind this public pillorying

Friday 23 September 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

All that said, however, the way in which she has been pilloried - there is no other word for it - in recent days is hypocrisy of the first order. One by one the household names that had contracted her to be their "face" have cut her adrift with varying expressions of disappointment. H&M led off the procession; then came Chanel and Burberry - saying it was "saddened" - and yesterday the cosmetics company Rimmel.

Finally, Ms Moss issued an apology. In 100 elegant words or so, which did not mention drugs, she said that she accepted she had "various personal issues" to address and had started "taking the difficult, yet necessary, steps to resolve them". She was apologising to all those she had "let down".

But this is hardly the point. The point is that all the companies which had been so eager to sign her up moved to sever their ties only when incriminating pictures appeared in a national newspaper. Before that, apparently, they either believed that her drug-taking was irrelevant to her work for them or they deliberately turned a blind eye. They can hardly say they did not know. Ditto the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Ian Blair - except that he joined the chase even later. Once the pictures had unleashed the predictable furore, Sir Ian announced that the Met was starting an investigation. What promptness! What principled concern for the law!

Like it or not, many people in the public eye use banned drugs and are known to do so. If Sir Ian wants to see the law on class A drugs enforced, he needs to have his officers out there enforcing it, not waiting for the press to supply him with evidence. And the companies that employ models with a habit could do worse than fund their rehabilitation as a part of their contract. Then no one need be "saddened" or "disappointed". Everyone would be addressing the "issue".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in