Leading article: The benefits of brevity in a public inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Leveson Inquiry has already achieved much, and up-coming evidence from politicians promises more. But Lord Justice Leveson is nonetheless right to propose that the second phase of hearings – to consider the specifics of what happened at the News of the World – be shelved.
The cost to the public purse is not the only consideration. There is also the matter of need. By legal necessity, the second phase was only ever to take place after any criminal investigations had been concluded. Given the complexity of the case, and the likelihood of appeal, that could be several years away. And with all available evidence by then already evaluated by the courts, there is little cause to duplicate the effort at another round of hearings.
One need look no further than the Iraq Inquiry – now approaching its third year, at a total cost of more than £5m – to appreciate the benefits of brevity.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments