Leading article: The abolition of GCSEs would not suit all
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It would be relatively easy for Eton College to abandon GCSEs, as its headmaster, Tony Little, would like to do, since the vast majority of its pupils would probably get into a leading university through predicted A-level grades. For pupils at an inner-city comprehensive, as Joan McVittie, head of Woodside High School in Tottenham, north London, suggests, it would be far harder. Her pupils need recognised qualifications to get a job. Mr Little has the kernel of a good idea, now that the leaving age for education is being raised to 17, and eventually 18. And his ideas would have more credibility if we moved to a system where pupils applied to university after receiving their A-level grades – so that admissions staff do not need to look at GCSEs for proof of performance. Even then, though, something more copper-bottomed than an internally assessed leaving certificate will be needed to make the alternative to GCSEs acceptable to employers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments