Leading article: Stylist over substance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Labour Party's expenditure of more than £7,000 on a personal hair stylist for Cherie Blair during last year's general election has prompted fresh grumbling about the role of the UK's unofficial "first lady". No doubt the Prime Minister's wife is thoroughly used to being a hate figure by now. Much of it she brings on herself, not least through an unseemly preoccupation with money. But it is hard to condemn Mrs Blair on this latest charge.
Being the Prime Minister's wife in a frantic election campaign is a difficult role. It is not that ridiculous for a key performer to have a stylist on standby. She is certainly photographed enough for her appearance to matter. We would note, however, that considering the Labour Party is paying for her hair, it is a shame the contents of her head do not have a greater influence on the Government's thinking on civil liberties and foreign policy. If they did, Mrs Blair's maintenance would seem cheap at twice the price.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments