Leading article: Royal Bank of Scotland still has a long way to go
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For Royal Bank of Scotland's management, the decision to bow to pressure and cut back bonuses by nearly two thirds no doubt looked like a fine concession.
In fairness, it was certainly better than the usual brass-necked disdain. But the fact that the total bonus pot can be shrunk by 60 per cent and still total £400m – and that in an institution that has made a loss for the past four years running and is majority-owned by the taxpayer – only emphasises how disconnected bankers still are from the rest of us.
Where, outside of the financial industry, would such a situation be tenable? And with RBS expected to reveal another £2bn worth of losses this morning, one can only speculate about how many of those dipping into the giant bonus pool have really worked beyond the call of duty.
How far there is to go before the banks join the real world again.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments