Leading article: Private eyes can't be a law unto themselves
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Commons Home Affairs Committee was treated yesterday to a seminar with the former Information Commissioner and a preview of a Channel 4 Dispatches programme about private investigators. As committee members will have discovered, if they did not know before, the Leveson Inquiry has opened but a small window on to what is a burgeoning industry. It is not just, or even primarily, journalists who have availed themselves of its services. And among the practitioners are at least some who flout the law, obtaining and trading in personal data that is supposed to be protected.
There should be serious concern about how far the penalties for offences are effective, if at all. But the bigger question of regulating private investigators also needs to be broached, and urgently. It is hard to escape the impression that, in current circumstances, a section of the industry is making a mockery of the law.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments