Leading article: President Bush to the rescue?

Wednesday 27 December 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The administration of George Bush is not exactly known for its responsible stewardship of the environment. Lest we forget, Mr Bush is the President who wanted to open a protected part of Alaska to oil prospecting, until the plan was scuppered by Congress. He is the President, too, who - in an early act of defying the international consensus - reversed his predecessor's acceptance of the Kyoto treaty even before Congress had refused to ratify it. And he has given every impression of believing that global warming is not a threat - at least not one that the US needs to help avert.

So why is it that, two years before leaving office, the Bush administration has suddenly decided to embrace the cause of the polar bear? The Department of the Interior has now announced that the polar bear should be listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act. Given the known stance of the administration on such subjects, the explanation was little short of remarkable.

The Department of the Interior has reviewed all the available data and now accepts that the sea ice on which the polar bear depends has been receding. As a result, it has concluded that polar bears could be endangered within the relatively short span of 45 years. A department official is quoted as saying this: "Obviously, the sea ice is melting because the temperatures are warmer."

To which environmentalists the world over would be justified in asking what took the administration so very long. Regrettably, there is an easy answer: the administration is meeting the terms of an agreement it reached reluctantly with three campaigning organisations, including Greenpeace, which had gone to court, accusing the administration of tardiness in recognising the polar bear's plight. Now it is possible to approach yesterday's announcement with scepticism. It does not actually list the polar bear as threatened, it merely opens a three-month period of public comment. When the three months are up, the administration could simply let the matter drop - if campaigners do not keep up their pressure.

Let's not be too churlish, though. It may have taken a two-year review and a lawsuit, but the Bush administration is now on record as accepting the reality of global warming and also the need to do something about it. This is a huge advance, for the polar bear's plight cannot be considered in isolation. What applies to this bear applies to other species and other habitats around the globe. With a more alert public and a Democrat-controlled Congress, the Bush administration may even find itself forced to introduce statutory limits on US industry's carbon emissions. Now there's a tantalising thought for the New Year.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in