Leading article: Parliament can only benefit from greater diversity
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A call to give MPs more money and more time off may not sound like much of a vote winner. But a think tank says that could be one way to attract a different kind of person into Parliament. The Institute for Government estimates that candidates can run up bills of tens of thousands of pounds, more than enough to deter most people, which helps explain why so many MPs come from the same narrow, public school- educated elite.
The think tank believes that means-tested bursaries might tempt more women, ethnic minorities and less well off people to try their hand. It also advocates US-style open primaries, enabling ordinary people to play a role in the selection of candidates. These ideas are worth considering. "Diversity" can be dismissed as a buzzword. But if Parliament does not become more truly representative of the nation, it cannot hope to remain at the centre of political life.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments