Leading article: Open wide
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For a government to botch one set of contract negotiations with National Health Service workers, as this government did with general practitioners, might be seen as unfortunate. To do it a second time, this time with dentists, begins to look like incompetence.
Yet that is the scathing verdict delivered today by the Commons Health Select Committee. The committee argues that the new NHS contract for dentists, implemented two years ago, has failed to improve services for patients because, under the new treatment pricing system, dentists have no financial incentive to treat complex cases.
The reform has also failed to increase the number of people getting NHS dental treatment. Figures released last month showed that a million fewer people are now seeing an NHS dentist than before the contract was negotiated.
We should, of course, recognise that sorting out dentistry in this country was always going to be the political equivalent of root-canal surgery, rather than a simple filling. The British, for some inexplicable reason, have always tended to place a lower priority on looking after their teeth than their general health. The infrastructure and culture of regular check-up visits to the dentist simply does not exist. But the Government certainly did not do itself any favours by failing to put the new system out to trial before implementing it.
It is hardly an attractive proposition, but if we are to see more people getting better treatment for their teeth, health ministers are going to have to persuade the patient to open wide and say "ahhh" once again.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments