Leading article: Obstacles to financial reform

Sunday 19 October 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Much is still uncertain in the global banking crisis, but one thing most policymakers seem able to agree on is that oversight of the world's financial sector has been lamentable.

One of the lessons of the crisis is that no modern economy stands alone. Shocks are transmitted across borders at lightning speed. If capital flows are international, the bodies that monitor them – such as the IMF and the World Bank – need to be truly global too. The present shock has found them to be deficient in this respect.

So the logic of President Bush's call, after a meeting with the French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the weekend, for a series of talks between world leaders later this year on the subject, is perfectly reasonable in principle. Yet these particular meetings seem unlikely to produce significant progress towards better regulation of global finance, let alone the "new Bretton Woods agreement" that many believe is necessary.

The differences of emphasis in the weekend's comments by Mr Bush and M. Sarkozy have been remarked upon. The US President said that any new measures must not undermine the functioning of free markets. By contrast, his French counterpart stressed the need to stamp out "hateful practices" such as the activities of hedge funds. Some see such differences as a potential sticking point in talks. In truth, though, agreement on principles is likely to be the easy part. The argument on regulation has moved a long way in a few short weeks. The doctrinaire deregulators are discredited. The fact that even the US administration felt it necessary to ban the short-selling of financial stocks last month emphasises how much the game has changed with regard to powerful, unregulated players such as hedge funds.

The bigger obstacle is not one of principle, but politics. Mr Bush is a lame duck president, seeing out his final few months in power. He has no authority to launch a major new restructuring of the global financial system. Last month the President was unable even to persuade his own party to approve a rescue package for US banks. This is not the man to fashion a new Bretton Woods. As in so many other areas, the world needs a new American president before it can begin move on.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in