Leading article: No just cause to deny Dr Fox his golden goodbye
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Amid the hullabaloo over Liam Fox's resignation, it is far too easy to fulminate against the disgraced Defence Secretary walking away with a £17,000 pay-off.
The case can assuredly be made that Mr Fox was negligent; that, had he not resigned, he would have been sacked; that, as a result, he deserves no severance deal. But it is an argument that smacks too much of retribution. The rules state that ministers who are either sacked or resign under a cloud are eligible for three months' pay. As such, the former Defence Secretary is entitled to his money.
In the light of his comprehensively unprofessional behaviour, swipes from Mr Fox at the "vindictiveness" of the media are wholly unconvincing. But the clamour for further punishment for a man who has already lost his career looks like vengefulness indeed. Mr Fox's £17,000 should be left alone.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments