Leading article: More spelling, less made-up phonics, please
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The president of the National Association of Head Teachers is right that the Government is in danger of returning to the bad old days when schools focused more on tests and league tables than on pupils' needs.
Where Steve Iredale is wrong, however, is in singling out the proposed spelling, grammar and punctuation test for 11-year-olds. Given that as many as one in five children are not reaching the required standard of literacy, there is a strong argument for keeping a closer eye on progress.
Better, then, to balance out the introduction of an extra literacy assessment for those about to go off to secondary school, by axing the in-coming reading test for six-year olds. Not only does the controversial phonics scheme include made-up words as well as real ones – causing problems for some brighter children – but it also comes just a year before a set of national curriculum tests. The phonics test should go.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments