Leading article: John Prescott... must we?

Saturday 29 April 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

High of mind and socially liberal of politics, this newspaper tries to stay out of politicians' bedrooms. One place we would certainly never think to go voluntarily would be the Deputy Prime Minister's boudoir. We hold back on the threshold, therefore, to observe two things. One is that Cecil Parkinson's resignation 23 years ago seems to belong to a different sexual and political era. David Mellor resigned in 1992 not because of his extra-marital affair, but because he failed to declare a free holiday, while David Blunkett's error two years ago was get his office to chase up his son's nanny's visa. Unless John Prescott has demonstrably abused his public office in pursuit of private interests, the lucrative confessions of Tracey Temple should have no bearing on his suitability for his job.

Our second observation is that it is a little difficult to apply the conventional test to Mr Prescott, whose responsibilities are often ambiguous. The test is that a politician's private life is a private matter unless it affects his or her ability to do the job. In the case of the Deputy Prime Minister, the question is: how would we tell?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in