Leading article: In praise of tougher mortgages

 

Monday 19 December 2011 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mortgages are a tricky subject for the British. Between the near obsession with home ownership and the disproportionate economic influence of property prices resulting from it, anything that threatens to curb lending is apt to raise a storm of protest.

The Financial Services Authority's efforts to put "common sense" back into the mortgage market are a case in point. The proposals published yesterday appear almost laughably obvious. Does it really take a watch-dog to rule that mortgages should only be agreed "when there is a reasonable expectation that the customer can repay"? Or that an assessment of what the borrower can afford should take into account the possibility that interest rates might rise or that house prices might not? Sadly, judging by the runaway lending that preceded the financial crisis, it most certainly does.

If the FSA's shake-up proceeds as planned, by 2013 all potential borrowers will be asked to prove their income, rather than simply making an unsubstantiated statement. And, although lenders will not have to comb through every detail of household outgoings, major commitments such as heating bills must be taken into account. Furthermore, interest-only mortgages will only be allowed when the borrower has a decent plan to repay the capital, rather than simply relying on rising property values.

All are sensible measures, and scaremongering about a million unsuccessful mortgage applications, a drag on house prices and a £3bn hit to the economy should be ignored. Within reason – and the FSA's plans are entirely reasonable – a more sober property market would be a good thing.

In the aftermath of the severest financial crisis in decades, precipitated by a housing bubble fuelled by ludicrously lax mortgage deals, the case for maintaining the status quo cannot conscionably be made. Reinflating the same bubble will not resolve the situation. Nor will it protect over-extended buyers from the trauma of default and repossession. We simply cannot continue to chase the fantasy of home ownership at the expense of economic stability. The FSA is right: it is time for some common sense.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in