Leading article: How to calculate the damage from the maths deficit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A central recommendation of a House of Lords report into the state of science and technology is that maths should be compulsory for all pupils, even after the age of 16. And quite right, too. It is not only that the UK has a shortage of mathematicians, but that those wanting to study science or engineering can find their prospects limited by their lack of maths. Some universities now offer remedial classes.
One culprit is the A-level system in England and Wales that requires such early specialisation; on the Continent, maths is compulsory for most pupils until they leave school. But requiring everyone to spend another two years studying maths will improve general standards of awareness only if teaching in the years until 16 improves. Otherwise a consequence of more obligatory maths will be more disaffected pupils facing a subject they do not understand. By 16-plus much of the damage has been done.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments