Leading article: How much is enough?

Sunday 27 January 2008 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Almost one in 10 households is now defined as wealthy, with an income nearly three times the average. Alas, most families do not feel well-off. In fact, they say they would need twice as much as they currently bring in (just short of £90,000 a year) to feel as rich as the raw figures suggest they should.

This is bad news for the Government, because it means the feel-good factor it might reasonably expect to radiate from so many wealthy households is practically non-existent. It is even worse news for the families themselves, where the perpetual striving must presumably go on. These households will only feel well-off – or so the researchers say – when they have paid off their mortgage, bought more than one home and are sending their children to private school. To the average household on £33,000 a year, not to speak of those on less, the response must be obvious: what on earth are these people doing with their money to feel the pinch at £90k? Or is there a distinction between a comfortable life and wealth, which the analysts have not caught up with – wealth here denoting luxury rather than mere comfort?

Part of the answer is surely expectation and an awareness – via television - of how the even more wealthy live. We gain the impression that there are more super-rich than there really are, and don't appreciate that "wealth" goes from £90k to infinity. But maybe something else is at work here.

Wealth carries a connotation of financial security. If this much money is bringing so few British households a sense of security, perhaps some household financial compasses need resetting.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in