Leading article: Fourth time lucky?

Monday 25 July 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Today's talks in Beijing start without the breakthrough. But the very fact that the various parties - consisting of North and South Korea, China, Russia and Japan as well as the US - have agreed to hold them gives rise to some degree of optimism that positions may be shifting. The government of Pyongyang, having announced it has developed at least one and possibly more nuclear warheads, now appears to want to discuss ways of normalising its relations with the rest of the world and ensuring the aid it so badly needs to meet its parlous economic state. There is in its approach at least a hint it might be prepared to negotiate away its new-found nuclear status in return for US assurances over security and trade.

Washington for its part also seems to be softening its position from outright hostility to North Korea, and the hope that rising pressure could bring about the fall in the regime of Kim Jong-il, to an acknowledgement that it may be better to cut a deal to denuclearise the regime rather than to seek its downfall.

That leaves a huge stretch of ground to cover before the talks get anywhere. After all the raised hopes and fallen expectations of previous talks, there remains a large credibility gap between Pyongyang's words and its deeds. With good reason, the US Congress remains extremely doubtful about doing anything that might prop up the odious regime of Kim Jong-il. Their hostility in turn has made it difficult for a White House divided in its advice and instincts to present a clear policy towards North Korea. Does it want accommodation or regime change, or could the one lead to the other?

It is the same question that comes up in all the discussions over Iran's nuclear ambitions, as well as Washington's relations with other countries in the Middle East. But North Korea has the weapons now, and America's allies in the region, as well as China and Russia, are pushing hard for constructive talks that offer North Korea real carrots as well as constant sticks. If Washington is to show a more flexible stance anywhere, it may well be here.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in