Leading article: False impressions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Senior Tories, past and present, are tying themselves in knots over Jeffrey Archer's efforts to rejoin the party. Central Office first denied that he was back in the party, then confirmed that he had submitted an application. Michael Howard said that it would be up to his successor to decide what to do about it, while David Cameron, the man most likely to succeed him, said that, even if Lord Archer did rejoin, he - Cameron - would not allow him to retake the whip.
Entertaining though this spectacle is to watch - David Mellor's uncompromising stand against Lord Archer's rehabilitation offering one of the weekend's more pleasurable diversions - the better course is surely magnanimity. Lord Archer was suspended from the party for five years after his conviction for perjury. Having served his prison term, he deserves the same chance to resume his life as any other ex-offender.
The reluctance of some senior Tories to welcome Lord Archer back into the fold is understandable. The man is not just a rogue, he is an incorrigible self-publicist and unlikely to stay out of the headlines for long. But if it is legal for him to sit in the Lords - which it is - why should he not rejoin his local party? He can manage without the whip.
Strange to say, had the Government proceeded with its plans for further Lords reform, Lord Archer would have found it harder to resume his political career. As someone sentenced to more than 12 months in prison, he would automatically have lost his seat. But the reform plans were shelved. Perhaps ministers knew, when they abandoned them, that this bane of the Tory party would be the first beneficiary.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments