Leading article: Face up to the future

Wednesday 04 February 2009 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When Mark Zuckerberg launched "The Facebook" in his Harvard dormitory five years ago, he hoped the new website would help his fellow students stay in touch and get to know each other better. But it was not just the elite of this Ivy League bastion whose social lives were destined to be revolutionised by Mr Zuckerberg's invention.

Facebook, the biggest social networking site, has 150 million users. The music-orientated MySpace is not far behind with 130 million. Meanwhile, Twitter, a stripped-down variant of the networking site, is growing rapidly too. In five years, these sites have become an entirely new global communications platform. No wonder they have been courted by advertisers. But does the boom of the sector have any wider social utility? Enhanced human contact is the obvious answer to that. These sites allow people to stay in touch in a hectic and busy world. Friends across the globe are accessible with the click of a mouse. The sites are also helping to re-engage some people with politics. Barack Obama's presidential campaign managed to harness such sites with considerable success.

Yet there are potential hazards. One of the reasons Facebook outperforms its peers is that it offers the security of being part of a private community of friends. But many users had a rude awakening two years ago when it emerged that Facebook was automatically advertising their purchases online. Sometimes, there is such a thing as too much shared information. Likewise, few users grasp just how much information Facebook and other sites have compiled about them for the purposes of selling it on to advertisers. It is possible that some heavy social networkers will come to regret invading their own privacy quite so enthusiastically in years to come.

That said, nigh on every new popular technology, from the motor car to the mobile phone, came with certain hazards. They survived because their utility manifestly outweighed their drawbacks. At the moment, social networking sites seem to be fulfilling a burgeoning demand for people to talk to each other online. For now, the revolution continues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in